Lack of Success is Not Evidence of Bias
Christopher Johnson, a self-represented Plaintiff, commenced a copyright infringement action in November 2021 against several defendants, including the Canadian Tennis Association (“Tennis... Read More
Federal Court Confirms Defendants’ Right to Challenge Non-Asserted Claims in PM(NOC) Actions
The Federal Court has recently affirmed by way of summary judgment motion that a Defendant to an action commenced under the Patented... Read More
Do it yourself: Court clarifies obligations of party that breaches protective order and implied undertaking
In Molo v Chanel, Associate Justice Tabib clarified what a party is required to do when it has breached a protective order.... Read More
Federal Court takes Rovi’s IPTV patents off the air
Justice Lafrenière dismissed Rovi’s infringement actions and granted the defendants’ counterclaims for declarations of invalidity, holding that nothing in the asserted claims... Read More
Relief from the implied undertaking required before varying a confidentiality order
The Federal Court found it was inappropriate to vary the Protective and Confidentiality Order in the original action brought by Janssen against... Read More
Norwich Orders are not a Second Stab at Discovery
In the context of Worthware’s action against Raysoft for inducing patent infringement, Worthware brought a motion for a Norwich Order under Rules... Read More
Onus is on (you) to Further Restrict a Protective Order
In Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V. v Apotex Inc., 2022 FC 1262, Case Management Judge Trent Horne held that where parties cannot agree on... Read More
Sandoz’s Choice: Extend the Statutory Stay and Adjourn Trial or Forego New Invalidity Defences
The Federal Court granted Sandoz Canada Inc. leave to amend its Statement of Defence in an action under the Patented Medicines (Notice... Read More
Costs Awarded on Appeal Clarifying FC Model Protective Order
Justice Go recently released her costs order and reasons arising from Surewerx USA Inc. v. Dentec Safety Specialists Inc., 2022 FC 1190.... Read More
Is Divided Infringement on the Horizon in Canada?
In the companion decisions Rovi Guides v. Videotron, 2022 FC 981 and Rovi Guides v. Bell, 2022 FC 979, the Federal Court... Read More
Akebia’s “Zombie Motion” is Put to Rest
In FibroGen, Inc. v. Akebia Therapeutics, Inc., Justice Rennie allowed FibroGen’s appeal from an order requiring that FibroGen file certain fact witness... Read More
For the Defendants’ Eyes Only: Court Permits Filing of Confidential Statement of Claim
In Bayer vs. BGP, Justice Pentney of the Federal Court permitted the filing of a confidential Statement of Claim. Bayer markets aflibercept... Read More
The Puck Drops Here: A Dynamic Site-Blocking Order Granted for the NHL Playoffs
In Rogers Media Inc., nine television networks who hold copyright in NHL games have successfully obtained a “dynamic” site-blocking order against unidentified... Read More
Lump Sum Costs? Ça “Dépens”!
Justice Grammond awarded Vidéotron Ltée and Groupe TVA inc. costs according to the Tariff after their success in 2022 CF 256, finding... Read More
Concession Counters Apple’s Bifurcation Motion in Battle over Standards Essential Patent
Wi-Lan sued Apple, and sought an injunction, claiming that several Apple products which comply with the 4G and 5G standards necessarily infringe... Read More
No Rubber Stamp of Appeals by the Federal Court of Appeal
The Federal Court of Appeal recently confirmed it is not prepared to rubber stamp unopposed appeals, or appeals on consent without having... Read More
Protective Orders Dead In Canada? – Not So Fast
Parties involved in patent litigation in the Federal Court often exchange sensitive confidential documents of an economic, scientific or technical nature as... Read More
Source Code is Relevant And Producible In Software Patent Infringement Action
Prothonotary Tabib’s recent decision in Guest Tek Interactive Entertainment v Nomadix considers a number of discovery-related issues that arose in the context... Read More
Pleading Amendments Alleging Prior Public Disclosure Refused Where Defendants Lack Material Facts
In 2015, Specialized Desanders sued Dynacorp Fabricators (now Enercorp Sand Solutions) and Progress Energy Canada for infringement of Canadian Patent No, 2,407,544... Read More
You Can’t Lose What You Never Had: Government Can’t Expropriate Unencumbered Seismic Data Copyright That Never Existed
In Geophysical Service Inc. v. The Queen, Prothonotary Tabib of the Federal Court struck GSI’s Statement of claim. In doing so, Prothonotary... Read More
Death of the Protective Order in the Federal Court of Canada?
Seedlings Life Science Ventures LLC v. Pfizer Canada Inc., 2018 FC 443 is the second decision (following Live Face on Web, LLC... Read More
Formalities for Confidentiality Orders Not Required for Trial Materials
On March 29, 2018 the Federal Court dismissed MediaTube’s motion challenging the confidentiality designations made by Bell Canada during and following the... Read More