Erectile Dysfunction Patent Comes Up Short: Tadalafil Patent Claims Found To Be Old and Obvious
On September 10, 2020, the Federal Court released its public Judgement and Reasons holding that all asserted asserted claims of Canadian Patent... Read More
CCM Scores With Obviousness Attack on Bauer’s Hockey Skate Patent
Bauer Hockey Ltd. v. Sport Maska Inc. (CCM Hockey), 2020 FC 624 was a patent infringement battle between two well-known skate manufacturers.... Read More
Court of Appeal dismisses Pfizer’s motion to strike PM(NOC) action as abusive
The Court of Appeal recently determined that the institution of proceedings under the “new” PM(NOC) Regulations, is not re-litigation or an abuse... Read More
Clean Sweep for Teva in VELCADE Patent Action
In a Judgment dated July 18, 2018, Justice Locke allowed Teva’s claim for section 8 damages in relation to its bortezomib product,... Read More
Inventive Concept Redux: Shire’s ADHD Prodrug Patent Upheld By Federal Court
In a decision released publicly on June 21, 2018, the Federal Court dismissed Apotex’s action against Shire seeking a declaration of invalidity... Read More
Bauer Hockey Helmets Avoid Infringement Injury
On May 7, 2018 the Federal Court granted MIPS action in part, findings its patent valid but not infringed by Bauer’s RE-AKT... Read More
Problem Gaming Patent Lacks Scintilla Of Utility
On May 25th, 2018 the Federal Court of Canada released its decision in Safe Gaming System Inc v. Atlantic Lottery Corporation involving... Read More
Federal Court Holds Biologic Patent Valid and Infringed
In the first patent action involving biosimilars, the Federal Court held that the patent was valid and infringed. The Kennedy Trust for... Read More
Court of Appeal Jettisons Uncertain “Inventive Concept” in Obviousness Analysis
The Federal Court of Appeal released its decision in the appeal from the successful patent impeachment action by SNF challenging the validity... Read More
Apotex Seeks Rehearing of NEXIUM Patent Validity Following Supreme Court’s Decision
On August 29, 2017 Apotex filed a motion with the Supreme Court of Canada, requesting a rehearing of the appeal and an... Read More
Court of Appeal Reaffirms Filing Date As Relevant Date for Assessing Sufficiency of Disclosure
On July 24, 2017, the Federal Court of Appeal released its Reasons for Judgement in Idenix’s appeal involving the drug sofobuvir, the... Read More
Should I Stay Or Should I Go? Federal Court Stays Re-Examination In Light Of Invalidity Action
On October 6, 2016, Justice Roy granted Camso’s motion to stay the re-examination of Camso’s 562 Patent until final judgment is rendered... Read More
Supreme Court Breaks The “Promise Doctrine” In NEXIUM Patent Dispute
On June 30, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada released its judgment in AstraZeneca v. Apotex, a case dealing with the utility... Read More
Crash Landing: Court Awards Damages Of $1.5 Million In Helicopter Landing Gear Case
In Airbus Helicopters v Bell Helicopter Textron, Justice Martineau of the Federal Court ordered Bell to pay $1.5 million in damages to... Read More
Hindsight Approach to Obviousness Rejected In Oilfield Patent Dispute
Justice Manson’s recent decision in Frac Shack Inc. v. AFD Petroleum Ltd., provides a framework for obviousness when dealing with a combination... Read More
Patentee’s Conduct in Impeachment Action Warrants 50% Elevation Of Tariff B Costs
In Pollard Banknote Limited v. Babn Technologies Corp. and Scientific Games Products (Canada) ULC (2016 FC 1193), Justice Locke dealt with the... Read More
Dow’s Complex Patent Case Justifies Increased Legal Fees
Justice O’Keefe has issued a costs award granting the successful party in a patent infringement action approximately 30% of its legal costs,... Read More
API Fails To Remove Excalibre: API’s Torque Anchor Patents Invalid Or Not Infringed
Excalibre Oil Tools Ltd. v. Advantage Products Inc. concerns the validity and infringement of three Canadian patents. Justice Manson held that the... Read More
Putting Your (Other) Best Foot Forward: Party May Introduce New Evidence or Argument in Subsequent Infringement Action
On September 19, 2016, Prothonotary Tabib granted, in part, Apotex’ motion to amend its statement of defence and counterclaim in an infringement... Read More
On Thin Ice: Court Dismisses Snowmobile Infringement Action
In Arctic Cat Inc v Bombardier Recreational Products, Justice Roy of the Federal Court dismissed Arctic Cat’s action against Bombardier for infringement... Read More
Qualifying Read-Ins Must Be “Reasonably Connected”
In Excalibre Oil Tools Ltd. v. Advantage Products Inc., API sought an order pursuant to Rule 289 of the Federal Courts Rules ordering... Read More
Ethinylestradiol/Drospirenone Formulation Patent Valid and Infringed
On September 7, 2016, Justice Fothergill released his public Reasons and Judgement in consolidated patent infringement/impeachment actions brought by Bayer against Apotex... Read More
Scratching Beyond The Surface: Court Revisits File Wrapper Estoppel
In Pollard Banknote Limited v BABN Technologies Corp, Justice Locke held that Canadian Patent No. 2,752,551 was invalid and, in the alternative,... Read More
Failure to Disclose Public Servant Status Will Not Void a Patent
On February 5, 2016 Justice Boivin (writing on behalf of the Court of Appeal) released the reasons for judgment in Brown v.... Read More
Going Down Swinging: Idenix’s Counterclaim for Infringement and Invalidity Dismissed as Own Patent Held Invalid
On November 2, 2015 Justice Annis released a 326-page decision holding that Canadian Patent No. 2,490,191 invalid (2015 FC 1156; see our... Read More