Reply evidence allowed under reserve of objection in Louis Dreyfus Company and CN Railway dispute
In Justice Diner’s decision in Louis Dreyfus Company v CN Railway Company, LDC was granted permission to file its reply evidence. The...Read More
It’s a fact: Methotrexate patent invalid for obviousness
In Medexus v Accord, the Federal Court concluded that a patent covering the use of methotrexate to treat inflammatory autoimmune diseases was...Read More
Admissibility of expert evidence is best left to the trial judge
McCain commenced a patent infringement action against Simplot, asserting that Simplot had infringed McCain’s 841 Patent directed to a process used for...Read More
Pass the Scalpel: “Surgical” Reply Report Responding to New Evidence Held Admissible
On the eve of trial, the Federal Court accepted filing of a reply report responding to new evidence but did not allow...Read More
Know Your Role: Court Boots Expert Reports Providing Opinions On Domestic Law
The Federal Court has allowed a pre-trial motion to strike expert reports and bar the authors of those reports from testifying at...Read More