FCA Confirms Obviousness of Lilly’s Tadalafil Patent
In Eli Lilly Canada Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals ULC, 2020 FC 816, Justice St-Louis held that the asserted claims of Lilly’s Patent... Read More
Enough (evidence) is enough: Redactions to invoices no barrier to lump sum costs award
In Eli Lilly v Apotex, Justice St-Louis awarded Apotex its costs in a patent action involving the drug tadalafil and three patents... Read More
Third Time’s a Charm: Tadalafil Use Patent Invalidated in Summary Trial
Canadian Patent No. 2,226,784 is generally directed to a pharmaceutical composition containing tadalafil or its physiologically acceptable salts or solvates for the... Read More
Erectile Dysfunction Patent Comes Up Short: Tadalafil Patent Claims Found To Be Old and Obvious
On September 10, 2020, the Federal Court released its public Judgement and Reasons holding that all asserted asserted claims of Canadian Patent... Read More
Costs of second tadalafil prohibition application against the same patent assessed at midpoint of column IV
As we previously reported here, Justice Gleason allowed Lilly’s prohibition application in respect of the Canadian Patent No. 2,226,784 with costs following... Read More
Court proposes new date for assessing double patenting
In Eli Lilly Canada Inc v Apotex Inc, 2015 FC 875, Justice Gleason of the Federal Court prohibited the Minister of Health... Read More
Proper date for assessing double patenting is the priority date of the earlier patent – Federal Court
On January 7, 2015, Justice De Montigny released the public Judgment and Reasons in a prohibition application under the Patented Medicines (Notice of... Read More