No Entitlement to Punitive Damages for Infringing Compatible Products
Angelcare Canada Inc v Munchkin, Inc, 2023 FC 1111 deals with the Plaintiffs’ entitlement to remedies arising from a successful patent infringement...Read More
Plaintiffs that Stand Together Win Together: Entitlement to Claim Under the Patentee
Following its decision that Munchkin Inc. had infringed the Plaintiffs’ patents for diaper pails and cassettes (see 2022 FC 507), the Federal...Read More
Despite Defendants’ Arguments, Plaintiffs Entitled to Permanent Injunction for Infringement by Previous Generations of Defendants’ Products
In Angelcare Canada Inc v Munchkin, Inc, 2023 FC 1111, the Federal Court examined the plaintiffs’ entitlement to injunctive relief, entitlement to...Read More
Complex Proceedings ≠ Complex Accounting: When to Deny the Accounting of Profits Remedy
Angelcare Canada Inc. v Munchkin Inc., 2023 FC 1111 deals with the Plaintiffs’ entitlement to remedies arising from a successful patent infringement...Read More
For Your (and In-House Counsel’s) Eyes Only: Court Clarifies Scope Of “Counsel’s Eyes Only” Disclosure Designation
In Angelcare v Munchkin, Justice Roussel of the Federal Court affirmed a decision allowing in-house counsel to access the “Counsel’s Eyes Only”...Read More