An essential part of construction: Federal Court revisits the test for whether a claim element is essential or non-essential
Boehringer v JAMP, 2024 FC 1198 was an action under the PMNOC Regulations concerning infringement and validity of two patents relating to...Read More
Reply evidence report allowed in part as it aids the Court in determining merit
Background In Justice Furlanetto’s recent decision in Boehringer v JAMP, the Court returned to first principles in deciding whether to allow a...Read More
Leave Granted to Amend Statement of Defence and Includes Bases of Invalidity not Contained in Notice of Allegation
In Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd v JAMP Pharma Corporation, 2023 FC 1414, Associate Judge Cotter of the Federal Court granted JAMP’s motion...Read More