Any publicly available teaching, no matter how obscure, is citable for obviousness – Court of Appeal
The Patent Act was amended in 1993 to to require that an invention cannot be obvious to the skilled person having regard to information that was...Read More
Court of Appeal narrows, but does not resolve, relevant date for assessing double patenting
On April 20, 2016 the Court of Appeal dismissed Mylan’s appeal of a prohibition Order in respect of Mylan’s proposed tadalafil product....Read More
LINGAYEN Trade-mark Cannot Be Preserved – Court of Appeal Clarifies Test for Marks Descriptive of Place of Origin
MC Imports Inc. appealed a decision of the Federal Court that invalidated its trade-mark for LINGAYEN in association with Filipino food products...Read More
“NIC OUT” gets Kicked Out: Federal Court of Appeal upholds Trade-mark Expungement
The Federal Court of Appeal has upheld the expungement of the mark “NIC OUT” from the Register of Trademarks. Product Source International...Read More
Speed Queen mark suffers quick end – Trade-mark expunged on appeal
Alliance Laundry Systems LLC v Whirlpool Canada LP, 2015 FCA 232 In a decision from the bench, the Federal Court of Appeal...Read More
Relief or Relapse? Federal Court of Appeal orders re-trial of STELARA infringement case
The Federal Court of Appeal has remitted the infringement and validity action regarding AbbVie’s Canadian Patent No. 2,365,281 and Janssen’s drug STELARA...Read More
Punitive damages for infringing (but never sold) helicopter landing gear upheld on appeal
On September 24, 2013, the Federal Court of Appeal released its Reasons for Judgment in Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limitée v. Eurocopter...Read More
4(2)(b) or not 4(2)(b) – Federal Court of Appeal answers the question in COMPLERA patent listing decision
On October 9, 2012, the Federal Court of Appeal released its Reasons for Judgment holding Canadian Patent No. 2,512,475 was not eligible...Read More