CCM Scores With Obviousness Attack on Bauer’s Hockey Skate Patent
Bauer Hockey Ltd. v. Sport Maska Inc. (CCM Hockey), 2020 FC 624 was a patent infringement battle between two well-known skate manufacturers.... Read More
Opting Out: Copyright Board Tariffs are not Mandatory
The Federal Court of Appeal’s decision in York University v. The Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright) is a lengthy judgment with important... Read More
Weighing the Options: Federal Court Confirms Standard of Review for Appeals from Decisions of Registrar of Trademarks
In Pentastar Transport Ltd. v. FCA US LLC, 2020 FC 367, the Federal Court confirmed the standard of review applicable to decisions... Read More
Court of Appeal Dismisses Apotex’ Perindopril Non-Infringing Alternative Appeal
In Apotex Inc v ADIR, 2020 FCA 60, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed Apotex’ appeal on its non-infringing alternative (NIA) defence... Read More
Joint Business Ventures do not Equate to Shared Ownership of IP
Corey Bessner Consulting Inc. (c.o.b. Core Consultants Realty) v. Core Consultants Realty Inc., 2020 FC 224 dealt with a soured business relationship... Read More
Plaintiff’s Lost Profits Relevant to Reasonable Royalty Analysis
Bauer Hockey Ltd. v. Sport Maska Inc. (c.o.b. CCM Hockey), 2020 FC 212 dealt with various motions seeking to exclude expert reports... Read More
Use of Copyrighted Materials in Market Research is not Fair Dealing
Stross v. Trend Hunter Inc., 2020 FC 201 was a simplified action dealing with copyright infringement and fair dealing. The Plaintiff, Alexander... Read More
Canada Proposes Introducing Patent File Wrapper Estoppel
Bill C-86, the Budget Implementation Act is an 884 page omnibus bill recently introduced in Parliament. Among a myriad of other items, the... Read More
Recognizing the High Cost of Litigation: Federal Court Awards 50% of Actual Legal Costs
The Federal Court has traditionally calculated costs awards using the amounts specified in Tariff B of the Federal Courts Rules. There has,... Read More
The New NAFTA: Trademark and Industrial Design Changes Under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement
Mexico, the United States and Canada have agreed on the text of a new trade agreement, known as the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement... Read More
The New NAFTA: Copyright Changes Under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement
Mexico, the United States and Canada have agreed on the text of a new trade agreement, known as the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement... Read More
The New NAFTA: Patent Changes Under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement
Mexico, the United States and Canada have agreed on the text of a new trade agreement, known as the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement... Read More
Making Room For the Internet: Bricks and Mortar Business Not Required for Canadian Trademarks
In Hilton Worldwide Holding LLP v. Miller Thomson the Federal Court pushed forward what constitutes “use” of a trademark in today’s on-line... Read More
Anticipated Appeals Cannot Be United
In Cooperstock v. United Airlines, Inc., the Court of Appeal held that an appeal can be stayed or consolidated with related appeals... Read More
Death of the Protective Order in the Federal Court of Canada?
Seedlings Life Science Ventures LLC v. Pfizer Canada Inc., 2018 FC 443 is the second decision (following Live Face on Web, LLC... Read More
Federal Court Holds Apotex Could Have But Would Not Have Used Non-Infringing Alternative
Apotex was held liable in 2008 for infringing ADIR’s patent by selling perindopril tables made in Canada to affiliates in the UK... Read More
Federal Court Holds Biologic Patent Valid and Infringed
In the first patent action involving biosimilars, the Federal Court held that the patent was valid and infringed. The Kennedy Trust for... Read More
Wesley Gets Crushed: Alleged Copyright Pirate Found Guilty of Contempt of Court
The Federal Court recently held an individual guilty of contempt of court for disobeying an interlocutory injunction prohibiting the sale of pre-loaded... Read More
Apo-Esomeprazole Section 8 Action Dismissed Due to Infringement
Apotex Inc. v. AstraZeneca Canada Inc, is the Federal Court’s decision regarding Apotex’s section 8 action, and AstraZeneca’s related infringement action, in relation... Read More
Why Are We Here? Actual Loss Required For Trademark Damages
Clearview Plumbing & Heating Ltd. v. Clockwork IP, LLC is a trademark infringement action that proceeded to trial despite the parties agreeing that... Read More
Court Dismisses Career College Copyright Case As Time Barred
In 907687 Ontario Inc. (c.o.b. International Institute of Travel) v. Shokour, 2017 FC 969, the Federal Court found that the plaintiff did... Read More
No Cookies For You! – Federal Court Confirms Jurisdiction to Issue Split Decisions in Trade-mark Oppositions
In Les Marques Metro / Metro Brands S.E.N.C. v. 1161396 Ontario Inc., 2017 FC 806, Metro appealed a Trade-marks Opposition Board decision... Read More
Desvenlafaxine Polymorph Patent Not Obvious – Federal Court
The Federal Court simultaneously issued a pair of prohibition orders against Teva and Apotex in relation to the drug desmethyl-venlafaxine succinate, which... Read More
Venlafaxine Section 8 Damage Award Reaffirmed Upon Redetermination
Back in 2014, the Federal Court issued its judgment in Teva’s section 8 damages action in relation to the drug venlafaxine. On... Read More
Aitken Klee successful in Teva Olanzapine Section 8 Damages Case
The Federal Court recently issued its decision in Eli Lilly Canada Inc. v. Teva Canada Limited, 2017 FC 88, Teva’s action for... Read More