Preventous’ fishing expedition (v Canada): Hook, line, and sinker-but no catch
The Federal Court dismissed a Federal Courts Rule 51 appeal by Preventous Collaborative Health, which sought the production of documents from Health...Read More
Time warp on the Patent Register: Amendments to Bayer’s aflibercept judicial review
In two judicial reviews considering when a first person’s patent is determined to be eligible for the Patent Register, and when a...Read More
Time warp on the patent register: Amendments to EMD Serono’s MAVENCLAD judicial review
This is one of two motions relating to judicial reviews that considered when a first person’s patent is eligible for listing on...Read More
CUSMA vs Food and Drug Regulations: Federal law predominates
Justice Stratas, writing a unanimous decision for the Federal Court of Appeal in Janssen v Attorney General of Canada, 2024 FCA 66,...Read More
Save It For The Action: Filgrastim Appeal Dismissed As Moot
In Amgen v Apotex, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed Amgen’s appeal of the Federal Court decision that dismissed Amgen’s application for...Read More
Necessity Not the Only Test for Parties Seeking to be Added to a Proceeding
Justice Kane’s decision in Apotex Inc. v. Minister of Health, 2016 FC 776, has clarified that not all parties will be required...Read More
Post-filing Amendments are Subject to Data Protection
In Hospira Healthcare Corporation v. The Minister of Health, Attorney General of Canada and Sanofi-aventis Canada Inc., Hospira was unsuccessful in its...Read More
Minister’s Import Ban Against Apotex Enacted For Improper Purpose
On October 14, 2015, Justice Manson of the Federal Court released his judgment and reasons in Apotex’s judicial review of the Minister...Read More
A Sheep In Wolf’s Clothing – Alleged Errors of Fact Should Not Be Dressed Up As Errors Of Law
The Federal Court of Appeal recently considered two competing appeals regarding patents listed on the Patent Register against Alcon’s moxifloxacin product, VIGAMOX....Read More
Compound patent is not listable against fixed dose combination – Federal Court of Appeal
On April 15, 2015, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed ViiV’s appeal of the Judgment of Justice Hughes that had held that Canadian...Read More
Apotex Challenges Minister’s Refusal To Approve Apo-rasagiline
Apotex is seeking judicial review of a decision to decline to issue a Notice of Compliance (“NOC”) to Apotex for its Apo-rasagiline...Read More
Product specificity requires “perfect matching”
In Eli Lilly Canada Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General) , Justice Bédard of the Federal Court ruled that the Minister of Health’s...Read More
Enantiomers are not innovative drugs – Federal Court of Appeal
On January 18, 2013, the Federal Court of Appeal, in a 2:1 decision, released its Reasons for Judgment holding that Takeda’s dexlansoprazole...Read More