Court of Appeal Jettisons Uncertain “Inventive Concept” in Obviousness Analysis
The Federal Court of Appeal released its decision in the appeal from the successful patent impeachment action by SNF challenging the validity...Read More
Subject Matter Of A Compound Claim Cannot Be Expanded Beyond What It States – FCA
On September 18, 2017, the Federal Court of Appeal released its decision in BMS’ appeal of a decision dismissing its prohibition application...Read More
U-Box It Knocks Out U-Haul’s Confusing Trademark Applications
U Box It, a Canadian company providing garbage removal and waste management services, is the registered owner of the Canadian trademark U...Read More
Vacated injunction And Anton Piller Order Resurrected Pending Appeal in Kodi Add-On Copyright Case
In the continuing saga between broadcasters and set-top boxes, the Federal Court of Appeal handed a group of Canadian broadcasters a temporary...Read More
Court of Appeal Reaffirms Filing Date As Relevant Date for Assessing Sufficiency of Disclosure
On July 24, 2017, the Federal Court of Appeal released its Reasons for Judgement in Idenix’s appeal involving the drug sofobuvir, the...Read More
Supreme Court Breaks The “Promise Doctrine” In NEXIUM Patent Dispute
On June 30, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada released its judgment in AstraZeneca v. Apotex, a case dealing with the utility...Read More
Supreme Court upholds worldwide injunction against Google
In Google v. Equustek, the Supreme Court of Canada today upheld a worldwide interlocutory injunction requiring Google to delist certain webpages from its...Read More
Notice and Notice: ISPs May Only Charge Reasonable Fees For Disclosing Identities Of Suspected Copyright Infringers
Sections 41.25 and 41.26 of the Copyright Act allow copyright owners to send notices of infringed copyright to ISPs, such as Rogers....Read More
Offer to Settle Must Stay Open To Start of Trial To Engage Double Costs
Offer to Settle Must Stay Open To Start of Trial To Engage Double Costs On May 8, 2017, the Federal Court of...Read More
FCA Upholds Ruling That Health Canada Liable For Negligence And Misfeasance In A Public Office
In Apotex Inc. v. Canada, 2017 FCA 73, the Federal Court of Appeal dealt with various appeals from the finding that Health...Read More
Court of Appeal Clarifies Meaning Of “Inventive Concept”
On April 11, 2017 the Federal Court of Appeal released its decision in BMS’ appeal from a Judgment of the Federal Court...Read More
Plavix 1’s “Inventive Concept” Did Not Change the Definition Of Obviousness – Federal Court of Appeal
On April 11, 2017 the Federal Court of Appeal released its decision in BMS’ appeal of a Judgment dismissing a prohibition application...Read More
Trial Judge Knows Best: Supra-Tariff Costs Award Upheld
In Nova Chemicals v. The Dow Chemical Company et al., the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed Nova’s appeal of the order requiring...Read More
Court Of Appeal Upholds Fair Dealing Reduction in K-12 Copying Tariffs
In Access Copyright v British Columbia Ministry of Education et al, the Federal Court of Appeal identified a single reviewable error in...Read More
Ordinary Actions Of Corporate Officers Not Sufficient To Pierce Corporate Veil In Oilfield Patent Infringement Action
On February 13, 2017 the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by NOV Downhole Eurasia Limited and Dreco Energy Services ULC...Read More
First Impression for Internet Confusion Occurs At Search Results Page – BCCA
On January 26, 2017, the BCCA granted Vancouver Community College’s appeal and held that it’s passing off claim against Vancouver Career College...Read More
Sufficiency Only Requires A Description Of One Way Of Making The Inventive Product
On January 12, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed Apotex’s appeal of Justice Barnes decision (see our previous post here) holding Canadian Patent...Read More
Not A Wet Eye In The Court: TearLab Appeal Dismissed
In TearLab v I-MED, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed TearLab’s appeal of Justice Manson’s dismissal of its motion for an interlocutory...Read More
Federal Court Mows Down Bison Grass Vodka Trade-mark Application
In CEDC International v Underberg, Justice Barnes dismissed CEDC’s appeal of the Trade-marks Opposition Board’s decision that prevented CEDC from registering “Żubrówka”...Read More
Does Double Patenting Have A Relevant date? Perhaps
In Apotex Inc. v Eli Lilly Canada Inc., the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed Apotex’s appeal of the Federal Court decision that...Read More
Without Early Working, Cross-Referenced Drug Submissions Need Not Address Listed Patents: Court of Appeal
On October 12, 2016 the Federal Court of Appeal released a number of judgments dealing with the circumstances in which a cross-referenced...Read More
Trial Judges Entitled To Some “Leeway” On Construction
On September 6, 2016, the Court of Appeal dismissed Nova Chemicals Corporations appeal from a judgment finding its SURPASS product infringes Canadian...Read More
Mövenpick’s “Marché & Wave” Trade-mark Withstands Richtree’s Opposition Appeal
On September 15, 2016, Justice Boswell dismissed Richtree’s appeal, pursuant to section 56 of the Trade-marks Act, from the decision of the...Read More
Court of Appeal Upholds Promised Utility Of Iron Chelation Patent
On September 15, 2016 the Court of Appeal dismissed Teva’s appeal Justice O’Reilly’s prohibition Order preventing the Minister of Health from approving...Read More
Federal Court of Appeal Rewrites Standard of Review
Needless to say, the issue of the standard of review applicable to orders of both judges and prothonotaries has been one of...Read More